Top News

United States: Supreme Court rejects Trump’s request to conceal documents on Capitol attack | international

Donald Trump at a rally to challenge the ratification of the results of the 2020 US presidential election.Jim Borg (Reuters)

The US Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected former President Donald Trump’s request to block Handing over documents from the White House relating to the attack on the Capitol. The decision of the highest court — with a conservative majority and three judges appointed by the former Republican president — sets the stage for the legal path so that the congressional commission of inquiry can Access to nearly 800 pages of required records About the January 6, 2021 attack.

Among the documents the committee requested from the National Archives, the institution that guards those records, information regarding Trump’s key advisers and memos to his press secretary. As well as the daily call from the White House, a record of his activities, visits, briefings, and phone calls from the President. Trump’s lawyers failed to file Attempting to hide information by invoking executive privilegeIt is a legal provision that protects the president’s communications with his team. President Joe Biden refused to invoke executive privilege in this case.

“President Trump is more than just an ordinary citizen,” Trump’s lawyers said in their letter to the Supreme Court to block the release of the documents, as the legal battle continues in lower courts. “He is one of five living Americans who, as past presidents, have been given special power to make decisions about the disclosure of records and communications created during their tenure,” the judges added. According to the former president, if the required records are made public, national security will be at risk.

See also  EEUU elimina requisito de prueba COVID-19 para viajes

Lawyers for the inquiry, made up of seven Democrats and two Republicans, defended their position in the Supreme Court, arguing that it should not torpedo their investigation. The commission’s work is “of paramount importance and urgency: the investigation of one of the darkest events in our nation’s history, a deadly assault on the United States Capitol and Congress, and an unprecedented disruption of the peaceful transfer of power” by a single president. to another,” they wrote.

Only Judge Clarence Thomas noted that he was against rejecting Trump’s request, but did not explain why. The judges also did not leave writing the reasons for their decision.

On November 9, a federal judge Remove the reason for defense Trump for the first time. Justice Tanya Chutkan then concluded that the congressional committee had the right to receive these documents and argued that “Trump’s position that he can override the express will of the executive branch [en alusión a la decisión de Biden de autorizar la entrega de documentos] It appears to be based on the idea that their power is there forever.” “But presidents are not kings,” he said. Trump’s lawyers appealed the ruling, and a month later, a federal appeals court upheld Judge Schutkan’s decision.

Join EL PAÍS to follow all the news and read without limits.

Participate

Subscribe here to me the news From EL PAÍS America and receive all the media keys for current affairs in the region

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button
Close
Close